Madame Quixote

Joined

Posts by Madame Quixote

posted

79
'THE DAWKINS DELUSION' New book responds to Dawkins 'The God Delusion'
by nicolaou in
1. social
2. current
in the wake of richard dawkins bestseller 'the god delusion' (which i and many others here have read) there has been a good deal of rebuttal from the 'faith' community.

now a new book is out published by alister mcgrath, professor of theology at oxford university.

it is entitled 'the dawkins delusion'.. has anyone read it or ordered it yet?
Madame Quixote

And More:

Click the TV
to evolve a
single cell into
that lovable ape
we call the
Human Being.
79
'THE DAWKINS DELUSION' New book responds to Dawkins 'The God Delusion'
by nicolaou in
1. social
2. current
in the wake of richard dawkins bestseller 'the god delusion' (which i and many others here have read) there has been a good deal of rebuttal from the 'faith' community.

now a new book is out published by alister mcgrath, professor of theology at oxford university.

it is entitled 'the dawkins delusion'.. has anyone read it or ordered it yet?

Madame Quixote

Anthropology @ Mesa Community College

Anthropology at MCC

Social/Cultural Anthropology: study of contemporary cultures and the more general underlying patterns of human culture derived through cultural comparisons.

We invite you to learn about yourselves and the world of

human diversity through the study of Anthropology

What is Anthropology

Faculty Home Pages

Anthropology Courses

Events and Announcements

What Can I Do with Anthropology?

Contact Us About Anthropology

Course Materials
Anthropology in the News
Anthropology Active Learning Area
What is Culture
Intellectual Rights and Use
View Your World Globally
Global Citizenship

Need to Search for Something in MCC Anthropology?

On the Web MCC Anthropology

</form>

NMNH Home \| Research & Collections \| Paleobiology \| Anthropology \| Search

Welcome to ETE

Evolution of Terrestrial Ecosystems Program

The Evolution of Terrestrial Ecosystems (ETE) Program was formed by a group of professional researchers in paleontology who study the evolutionary paleoecology of land ecosystems. We share a conviction that long-term patterns of evolutionary change cannot be fully understood without knowledge of changes in ecology (at many scales) over geologic time periods, and an understanding of the interaction between ecological and evolutionary processes. Thus, we are interested not only in how the environment has changed, but how ecosystems themselves have changed, and how evolution has occurred in its ecological context over the last 400 million years. The ETE database captures and organizes fossil evidence concerning land biotas in support of ETE’s research objectives. The ETE Program is is affiliated with the Departments of Paleobiology and Anthropology (Human Origins Program) at the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC.

AAAS Symposium, Denver

ETE researchers have organized two symposia at the 2003 meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

ETE members, A. K. Behrensmeyer and S. L. Wing arranged the symposium entitled, "Disruptions in Ancient Land Ecosystems: Lessons from the Fossil Record." ETE member R. Potts and A. Brooks from The George Washington University organized, "Revolution and Evolution in Modern Human Origins: When, Where, Why?" Follow the links to details on each of these symposia from the AAAS website.

ETE Relational Database and ETE DataNet

The ETE relational database is now partially united with the Paleobiology Database Project's (PBDB) relational database. All primary database functions (queries, entries and updates) are available through the PBDB home page. The new combined database compiles information from the terrestrial and marine record, but lacks some of the data fields present in the original ETE database. ETE is currently updating and revising its database and web interfaces. Descriptions and a schema of the original ETE database are provided in the ETE Database Manual.

ETE data sources and related links

Welcome!

You are visitor number

since 17 October 1995

Award winning site!

This list of resources is maintained as an electronic supplement to our forthcoming two volume textbook on Quantitative Genetics to be published by Sinauer Associates. Links to web pages, particular programs, and notes/comments on all issues in quantitative genetics (i.e., animal breeding, plant breeding, evolutionary genetics, human genetics) can be found under the appropriate chapters for each volume.

The authors are Mike Lynch (in the Department of Biology at Indiana University at Bloomington) and myself ( Bruce Walsh in the Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology at the University of Arizona). E-mail the authors.

Home pages for our two volumes. (Links to programs, ftp sites, and web pages, as well as notes giving updated material are given in the webpage for the appropriate chapter.)
Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
Evolution and Selection of Quantitative Traits

List of Quantitative Genetic Websites
Online Class Notes
Genomes
Software
Meetings
Advanced Classes/Workshops
Quantitative-Genetics related listserves
Directories for Finding People
Animal Breeding and Genetics
Plant Breeding
Forest Breeding
Evolution
Human Genetics
Departments and Programs
Journals
Searchable bibliographices

Class notes for Genetics 320 (general information about genetics).

Volume 1: Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits

Published December 1997. Deals with basic biology and estimation of quantitiative characters.

Expanded Table of Contents

Current list of Typos and Other Still Errors (last updated 25 August 2003)

Sorted by date reported

Details and Ordering information

Topics Covered (Complete list of chapters)

Resemblance between relatives
Genetic variance components
Detecting major genes
Polygenes and polygenetic mutation
QTL mapping in inbred and outbred populations
Line cross analysis, inbreeding and outbreeding depression
Distribution theory, matrix methods, scaling and transformation
Estimation: regression, ANOVA, BLUP, and REML
Sibs, dialleles, correlated characters, GxE, maternal effects, sex-linked, threshold characters

For updates, programs, notes on new material, see the webpage for the appropriate chapter

Comments to the publisher from original reviewers of the manuscript (W. G. Hill, James Crow, Ruth Shaw)
Reviews:
Warren Ewens, American Journal of Human Biology 11: 798-800. [ review
Trudy MacKay, Evolution 53: 307-309. [ review ]
Jim Cheverud, Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 108: 375-376. [ review ]
J. J. Colleau, Genetics, Selection, Evolution 30: 203-204. [ review ]
Nick Barton, Genetical Research 72: 73. [ review ]
Paul Siegel, Journal of Heredity 90: 256-257. [ review ]
Mary Marazita, Trends in Genetics 15: 120. [ review ]
Outi Savolainen, Forest Genetics 6: 88 [ review ]
William A. Nelson and Elizabeth E. Crone, The Quarterly Review of Biology 74: 225. [review ]
Christopher Basten, Theoretical Population Biology 57: 307 [review ]
Suzanne Leal, American Journal of Human Genetics 68: 548-549. [ review ]

Courses using Volume 1 (partial list):

[ Please drop us an e-mail so we can add your course to this list! ]

BioStatistics 578, Statistical Methods in Quantitative Genetics. Stephanie Monks, University of Washington (Winter Quarter, 2000).
Biometrical Genetics and Plant Breeding, Chris Cramer, New Mexico State University.
Module 8: Quantitative Trait Gene Mapping I, NCSU Summer Institute in Statistical Genetics, Z-B. Zeng, C. J. Basten, and R. Doerge.
Module 10: Quantitative Trait Gene Mapping II , NCSU Summer Institute in Statistical Genetics, Z-B Zeng, C.J. Basten, B. Yandell and I. Hoeschele.
Short Course in QTL mapping, as part of the Quantitative Genetics and Genome Analysis MSc degree at the University of Edinburgh. S. Knott (and others).

Volume 2: Evolution and Selection of Quantitative Traits

This is about 70 percent finished) will follow, and deals with natural and artificial selection on quantitative characters. Draft chapters can be downloaded from the Vol. 2 webpage.

Topics Covered (Complete list of chapters)

Genetic drift, including changes in non-additive variances
Selection theory: changes in means and variances, short and long-term response, effects of finite population size, index selection.
Measuring selection in natural populations
Phenotypic evolution models: applications to ecology, paleobiology, marcoevolution, sexual selection
Maintenance of quantitative genetic variability

Guest log

Please sign in with the Guest log , as I'm trying to get some idea who uses this page. The log requires a browser supporting forms. If yours does not, just sent me a quick e-mail. Thanks!

Notes on Program Links

Most programs are listed under the appropriate chapters.
There is a seperate list of general-purpose educational programs .
Only programs that are available free to the general community will be listed!!
To include your listing or report of errors, please e-mail me. Thanks!

Recent Books on Quantitative Genetics

Recent books not cited in our book.

Gallais, A. 2003. Quantitative Genetics and Breeding Methods in Autopolyploid Plants INRA, Paris 513 pp.
Sorensen, D., and D. Gianola. 2002 Likelihood, Bayesian, and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics. Springer 739 pp. ISBN 0-387-95440-6. $89.95 webpage
Bernardo, Rex 2002 Breeding for Quantitative Traits in Plants. Stemma Press 369 pp. ISBN 0-9720724-0-5. $65. Webpage
Knoury, Muin J., Terri H. Beaty, and Bernice H. Cohen. 1993. Fundamentals of Genetic Epidemiology. Oxford. 383 pp. ISBN 0-19-505288-9. $59.50
Lange, K. 1997. Mathematical and statistical methods for genetic analysis. Springer. 288PP. HARDCOVER $54.95 ISBN 0-387-94909-7 (Available at amazon.com)
- An excellent short text with a strong emphasis on probablistic and statistical issues, with a focus on human applications.
- Introduction: During the past decade, geneticists have constructed detailed maps of the human genome and cloned scores of Mendelian disease genes. They now stand on the threshold of sequencing the genome in its entirety. The unprecedented insights into human disease and evolution offered by mapping and sequencing will transform medicine and agriculture. This revolution depends vitally on the contributions of applied mathematicians, statisticians, and computer scientists. Mathematical and Statistical Methods for Genetic Analysis is written to equip graduate students in the mathematical sciences to understand and model the epidemiological and experimental data encountered in genetics research. Mathematical, statistical, and computational principles relevant to this task are developed hand in hand with applications to gene mapping, risk prediction, and the testing of epidemiological hypotheses. The book includes many topics currently accessible only in journal articles, including pedigree analysis algorithms, Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, reconstruction of evolutionary trees, radiation hybrid mapping, and models of recombination. Exercise sets are included.
- Contents: 1. Basic principles of population genetics; 2. Counting methods and the EM algorithm; 3. Newton's method and scoring; 4. Hypothesis testing and categorical data; 5; Genetic identity coefficients; 6. Applications of identity coefficients; 7. Computation of Mendelian likelihoods; 8. The polygenic model; 9. Markov chain Monte Carlo methods; 10. Reconstruction of evolutionary trees; 11. Radiation hybrid mapping; 12. Models of recombination; 13. Poisson approximation; Appendix A: Molecular genetics in brief.
Simm, G. 1998. Genetic Improvement of Cattle and Sheep. Farming Press. ISBN 0-85236-351-6. Softcover $49.95 (Available at amazon.com, search on title, not author)
Haines, J. L. and M. A. Pericak-Vance (eds). 1998 .Approaches to Gene Mapping in Complex Human Diseases . ISBN 0-471-17195-6. Softcover $79.95. 320 pages. (Available at amazon.com )
Sham, Pak. 1998. Statistics in Human Genetics ISBN 0-340-662417 Softcover $44.95 (Available at amazon.com ). 304 pages. Topics covered include the estimation of allele frequencies; the testing for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; classical and complex segregation analysis; linkage analysis for Mendelian and complex diseases and quantitative traits; the detection of allelic associations; the estimation of heritability for multifactorial traits; and path analysis.
Ott, Jurg. 1999. Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage (3rd ed). ISBN 0-801-861403. Johns Hopkins Univ Press. Softcover $55.00. 424 pages. (Available at amazon.com )
Plomin, Robert, John C. DeFries, Gerlad E. McClearn, and Peter McGuffin. Behavioral Genetics (4th ed). ISBN 0-7167-5159-3. Worth Publishers, New York. $89.50 449 pages. (Available at amazon.com )
Thompson, Elizabeth A. 2000. Statistical Inferences from Genetic Data on Pedigrees . ISBN 0-940600-49-8 .
- This monograph is based on lectures presented at a 1999 CBMS Summer Research Conference. It develops the probability models for genetic data on related individuals, from the meiosis level to data on extended pedigrees. The focus is on simple Mendelian traits, such as DNA markers, but on joint models for data at multiple genetic loci, such as arise in modern genome scan studies. The statistical approach is that of likelihood, maximum likelihood estimation, and methods for the analysis of latent-variable and hidden-Markov models including the EM algorithm, the Baum algorithm, and Monte Carlo imputation methods. The first half of the monograph develops the basic concepts and approaches, focusing on the ideas of gene identity by descent and the tracing of gene descent in pedigrees using meiosis indicators or inheritance vectors. This material should be accessible to first-year graduate students in statistics or biostatistics. Only a basic understanding of discrete probability and mathematical statistics (likelihood inference) are assumed. No genetic knowledge is presupposed, although some familiarity with basic terminology will be helpful. Building on these foundations, the second half of the monograph develops Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and Monte Carlo likelihood methods for the analysis of data on individuals in a known pedigree structure. This material is more specialized, but should be accessible to those who have mastered the earlier chapters, or who have studied hidden Markov models and MCMC methods. The objective is Monte Carlo estimation of likelihood surfaces and conditional probabilities, rather than Bayesian sampling of parameter spaces and posterior distributions. The penultimate chapter illustrates the methods presented, through detailed analysis of two examples, using recently implemented MCMC samplers and likelihood estimation procedures. The final chapter discusses related research areas and the potential for further development of methods.
- Ordering information ($30.00)
Quantitative Trait Loci Analysis in Animals , by Joel Weller. $50.00 (US) 304 pages. More details

Links to webpages on Quantitative Genetics

Class Notes (Some of these links appear to only be active when the class is taught)

Statistical Genetics, with a focus on Animal and Plant Breeding . Wyman Nyquist, Purdue University. Very extensive notes (essentially an on-line textbook)

Armidale Animal Breeding Summer Course 2003 . David Lindsay, Julius van der Werf, Mike Goddard, Ben Hayes, University of New England, Armidale NSW.

Armidale Animal Breeding Summer Course 2004.

2003 Nordic postgraduate course: Quantitative Genetics in Animal Breeding. Bruce Walsh and Bill Muir, Helsinki, Finland.

Quantitative Genetics and Animal Models . L. R. Schaeffer, University of Guelph.

Estimation of Genetic Parameters . L. R. Schaeffer, University of Guelph.

EEB 348: Population Genetics . Kent Holsinger, Univ. Conn.

Genomes

AnimalGenome Size Database ( C-values for over 2,100 species and subspecies of vertebrates and 800 invertebrates)

Human

Mouse

Fugu (Puffer fish)

Arabidopsis

Flybase (Drosophila)

Mosquito

Wormbase (C. elegans)

Dictyostelium

TIGR Microbial Database

Karen Ayres (University of Reading ) very extensive Statistical Genetics webpage

Software

For software for a particular topic, see the appropriate chapter in the Volume 1 webpage
Websites with lists of programs:
Genetics
Software for Animal Breeding
National Biotechnology Information Facility General list of genetic-analysis software
Pedigree drawing software.
Pedigree tools.
Genetic Analysis Software, a massive list (largely human genetic) from Rockerfeller University.
Linkage & QTL Mapping.
Genetic calculation applets, from Knud Christensen at The Royal Veterinary & Agricultural University, Denmark.
Statistics
StatLib---General Archive Massive listing of programs, hosted by the Department of Statistics at Carnegie Mellon University.
Statistical power analysis .
VassarStats web site , a collection from Richard Lowry, Department of Psychology, Vassar College,

Meetings

Upcoming
Recent Past
Gordon Conference on Quantitative Genetics, February 9 - 14, 2003. Ventura, California.
Conference on Long term selection . June 17 - 19, 2002, Urbana, Illinois.
Seventh World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production

(7th WCGALP) August 19-23, 2002. Montpellier, France.

Population and Evolutionary Genetics of Forest Tree Species Star‡ Lesn‡, Slovakia, August 25-29, 2002

Gordon Conference on Quantitative Genetics, February 18-23, 2001. Ventura, California.

Quantitative Genetics and Plant Breeding in the 21st Century. A Symposium held by the LSU Chapter of Sigma Xi from March 26 thru March 28, 2001 in Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Summaries from Previous meetings

Report and Recommendations from the NIH meeting on The Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits held at the (US) National Institutes of Health on December 10-11, 1997.

Reports from Sixth World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, University of New England, Australia (January 11-16th 1998).

Advanced Classes/Workshops

Summer Institute in Statistical Genetics, from University of Washington

The M.Sc./Diploma in Quantitative Genetics and Genome Analysis at the University of Edinburgh.

Quantitative-Genetics related listserves

ANGENMAP (ANimal GENe MAPpers) is an internet discussion group for all gene mappers and interested parties

Directories for Finding People

Evolution and population genetics

Animal Breeders and Geneticists

Animal Gene Mapping Community Directory

Animal Breeding and Genetics

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Animals (OMIA)
Animal Geneticists Discussion Group.
ANGENMAP Discussion Group (Animal Gene Mappers).
Animal Breeding and Genetics Group Wageningen University .
Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit University of New England (Armidale, New South Wales, Australia).
Domestic Animal Diversity Information System .
The Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics
AAABG (The Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics Inc) Genetic parameter site for traits in Pigs and beef cattle
American Society of Animal Science .
American Dairy Science Association (ADSA).
FABA, FABA - Finnish Animal Breeding Association.
Institute for Animal Science and Health (ID-DLO), in The Netherlands.
Animal Breeding and Genetics at University of Illinois (ADSA).
Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory (AIPL) , (Beltsville, Maryland)
CGIL, Centre for genetic improvement of livestock (Cananda)
The South African Stud Book and Livestock Improvement Association
STAGES Swine Testing and Genetic Evaluation System

Plant Breeding

Forest Breeding

Breeding theory and progeny testing working group of the International Union of Forest Research Organizations

Evolution

List of Evolution related web sites.
EVOL message homepage

Human Genetics

Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man. This database is a catalog of human genes and genetic disorders authored and edited by Dr. Victor A. McKusick and his colleagues at Johns Hopkins and elsewhere, and developed for the World Wide Web by NCBI, the National Center for Biotechnology Information. The database contains textual information, pictures, and reference information. It also contains copious links to NCBI's Entrez database of MEDLINE articles and sequence information.
Genetic Linkage Analysis server at Rockerfeller.
Statistical Genetics Group at the University of Michigan
SAGE Statistical Analysis for Genetic Epidemiology package
USCF's big Epidemiology page
American Society of Human Genetics

Departments and Programs

NCSU Program in Statistical Genetics (USA)
Quantitative Genetics and Genome Analysis at the University of Edinburgh (UK).
Genetics for Animal Breeding at the University of New England (Armidale, Australia).

Journals

The Journal of Quantitative Trait Loci (JQTL), an electronic journal sponsored by the Crop Science Society of America.
Genome
Nature Genetics
Journal of Animal Science
Journal of Dairy Science
Crop Science
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Evolution
Genetics

Searchable bibliographices

Joe Felsenstein's Bibliography of Theoretical Population Genetics (to 1981), in searchable gopher format
Fred Allendorf's Bibliography of Genetic Variation in Natural Populations

Home Pages: [ Walsh] - [ Volume One] - [ Volume Two] - [ What's new ]

Created 25 February 1995, last updated 31 Jan 2002

Bruce Walsh. [email protected] . Comments welcome.

About Nitro, your WWW faithful server.

Prominent Hominid Fossils

Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Ardipithecus ramidus
Australopithecus anamensis
Australopithecus afarensis
Kenyanthropus platyops
Australopithecus africanus
Australopithecus garhi
Australopithecus aethiopicus
Australopithecus robustus

Australopithecus boisei
Homo habilis
Homo georgicus
Homo erectus
Homo ergaster
Homo antecessor
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo neanderthalensis
Homo floresiensis
Homo sapiens

This list includes fossils that are important for either their scientific or historic interest, or because they are often mentioned by creationists. One sometimes reads that all hominid fossils could fit in a coffin, or on a table, or a billiard table. That is a misleading image, as there are now thousands of hominid fossils. They are however mostly fragmentary, often consisting of single bones or isolated teeth. Complete skulls and skeletons are rare.

The list is sorted by species, going from older to more recent species. Within each species, finds are sorted by the order of their discovery. Each species has a type specimen which was used to define it.

Each entry will consist of a specimen number if known (or the site name, if many fossils were found in one place), any nicknames in quotes, and a species name. The species name will be followed by a '?' if suspect. If the fossil was originally placed in a different species, that name will also be given.

The following terminology is used. A skull refers to all the bones of the head. A cranium is a skull minus the lower jaw. A braincase is the cranium minus the face and upper jaw. A skullcap is the top portion of the braincase.

Abbreviations: ER East (Lake) Rudolf, Kenya WT West (Lake) Turkana, Kenya KP Kanapoi, Kenya SK Swartkrans, South Africa Sts,Stw Sterkfontein, South Africa TM Transvaal Museum, South Africa OH Olduvai Hominid, Tanzania AL Afar Locality, Ethiopia ARA-VP Aramis Vertebrate Paleontology, Ethiopia BOU-VP Bouri Vertebrate Paleontology, Ethiopia TM Toros-Menalla, Chad

TM 266-01-060-1 , "Toumai", Sahelanthropus tchadensis
Discovered by Ahounta Djimdoumalbaye in 2001 in Chad, in the southern Sahara desert. Estimated age is between 6 and 7 million years. This is a mostly complete cranium with a small brain (between 320 and 380 cc). (Brunet et al. 2002, Wood 2002) It has many primitive apelike features, such as the small brainsize, along with others, such as the brow ridges and small canine teeth, which are characteristic of later hominids.

"ARA-VP, Sites 1, 6 & 7", Ardipithecus ramidus
Discovered by a team led by Tim White, Berhane Asfaw and Gen Suwa (1994) in 1992 and 1993 at Aramis in Ethiopia. Estimated age is 4.4 million years. The find consisted of fossils from 17 individuals. Most remains are teeth, but there is also a partial lower jaw of a child, a partial cranium base, and partial arm bone from 2 individuals.
ARA-VP-6/1 consists of 10 teeth from a single individual.
ARA-VP-7/2 consists of parts of all three bones from the left arm of a single individual, with a mixture of hominid and ape features.

KP 271 , "Kanapoi Hominid", Australopithecus anamensis
Discovered by Bryan Patterson in 1965 at Kanapoi in Kenya (Patterson and Howells 1967). This is a lower left humerus which is about 4.0 million years old. (Creationist arguments)

KP 29281 , Australopithecus anamensis
Discovered by Peter Nzube in 1994 at Kanapoi in Kenya (Leakey et al. 1995). This is a lower jaw with all its teeth which is about 4.0 million years old.

KP 29285 , Australopithecus anamensis
Discovered by Kamoya Kimeu in 1994 at Kanapoi in Kenya. This is a tibia, missing the middle portion of the bone, which is about 4.1 million years old. It is the oldest known evidence for hominid bipedalism.

AL 129-1 , Australopithecus afarensis
Discovered by Donald Johanson in 1973 at Hadar in Ethiopia (Johanson and Edey 1981; Johanson and Taieb 1976). Estimated age is about 3.4 million years. This find consisted of portions of both legs, including a complete right knee joint which is almost a miniature of a human knee, but apparently belongs to an adult.

AL 288-1, "Lucy", Australopithecus afarensis
Discovered by Donald Johanson and Tom Gray in 1974 at Hadar in Ethiopia (Johanson and Edey 1981; Johanson and Taieb 1976). Its age is about 3.2 million years. Lucy was an adult female of about 25 years. About 40% of her skeleton was found, and her pelvis, femur (the upper leg bone) and tibia show her to have been bipedal. She was about 107 cm (3'6") tall (small for her species) and about 28 kg (62 lbs) in weight. (Creationist arguments)

AL 333 Site, "The First Family", Australopithecus afarensis?
Discovered in 1975 by Donald Johanson's team at Hadar in Ethiopia (Johanson and Edey 1981). Its age is about 3.2 million years. This find consisted of remains of at least 13 individuals of all ages. The size of these specimens varies considerably. Scientists debate whether the specimens belong to one species, two or even three. Johanson believes they belong to a single species in which males were considerably larger than females. Others believe that the larger specimens belong to a primitive species of Homo.

"Laetoli footprints" , Australopithecus afarensis?
Discovered in 1978 by Paul Abell at Laetoli in Tanzania. Estimated age is 3.7 million years. The trail consists of the fossilized footprints of two or three bipedal hominids. Their size and stride length indicate that they were about 140 cm (4'8") and 120 cm (4'0") tall. Many scientists claim that the footprints are effectively identical to those of modern humans (Tattersall 1993; Feder and Park 1989), while others claim the big toes diverged slightly (like apes) and that the toe lengths are longer than humans but shorter than in apes (Burenhult 1993). The prints are tentatively assigned to A. afarensis, because no other hominid species is known from that time, although some scientists disagree with that classification. (Creationist arguments)

AL 444-2 , Australopithecus afarensis
Discovered by Bill Kimbel and Yoel Rak in 1991 at Hadar in Ethiopia (Kimbel et al. 1994). Estimated age is 3 million years. This is a 70% complete skull of a large adult male, easily the most complete afarensis skull known, with a brain size of 550 cc. According to its finders, it strengthens the case that all the First Family fossils were members of the same species, because the differences between AL 444-2 and the smaller skulls in the collection are consistent with other sexually dimorphic hominoids.

KNM-WT 40000, Kenyanthropus platyops
Discovered by Justus Erus in 1999 at Lomekwi in Kenya (Leakey et al. 2001, Lieberman 2001). Estimated age is about 3.5 million years. This is a mostly complete, but heavily distorted, cranium with a large, flat face and small teeth. The brain size is similar to that of australopithecines. This fossil has considerable similarities with, and is possibly related to, the habiline fossil ER 1470.

"Taung Child", Australopithecus africanus
Discovered by Raymond Dart in 1924 at Taung in South Africa (Dart 1925). The find consisted of a full face, teeth and jaws, and an endocranial cast of the brain. It is between 2 and 3 million years old, but it and most other South African fossils are found in cave deposits that are difficult to date. The teeth of this skull showed it to be from an infant about 5 or 6 years old (it is now believed that australopithecines matured faster than humans, and that the Taung child was about 3). The brain size was 410 cc, and would have been around 440 cc as an adult. The large rounded brain, canine teeth which were small and not apelike, and the position of the foramen magnum(*) convinced Dart that this was a bipedal human ancestor, which he named Australopithecus africanus (African southern ape). Although the discovery became famous, Dart's interpretation was rejected by the scientific community until the mid-1940's, following the discovery of other similar fossils.

(*) Anatomical digression: the foramen magnum is the hole in the skull through which the spinal cord passes. In apes, it is towards the back of the skull, because of their quadrupedal posture. In humans it is at the bottom of the skull because our head is balanced on top of a vertical column. In australopithecines it is also placed forward from the ape position, although not always as far forward as in humans.

TM 1512, Australopithecus africanus (was Plesianthropus transvaalensis)
Discovered by Robert Broom in 1936 at Sterkfontein in South Africa (Broom 1936). The second australopithecine fossil found, it consisted of parts of the face, upper jaw and braincase.

Sts 5, "Mrs Ples", Australopithecus africanus
Discovered by Robert Broom in 1947 at Sterkfontein in South Africa. It is a very well preserved cranium of an adult. It has usually been thought to be female, but there has been a recent claim that it is male. It is the best specimen of africanus. It is about 2.5 million years old, with a brain size of about 485 cc. (It has recently been claimed that the fossils Sts 5 and Sts 14 (see next entry) were from the same individual)

Sts 14, Australopithecus africanus
Discovered by Robert Broom and J.T. Robinson in 1947 at Sterkfontein (Broom and Robinson 1947). Estimated age is about 2.5 million years. This find consisted of a nearly complete vertebral column, pelvis, some rib fragments, and part of a femur of a very small adult. The pelvis is more human than apelike, and is strong evidence that africanus was bipedal (Brace et al. 1979), although it may not have had the strong striding gait of modern humans (Burenhult 1993).

BOU-VP-12/130 , Australopithecus garhi
Discovered by Yohannes Haile-Selassie in 1997 at Bouri in Ethiopia (Asfaw et al. 1999). This is a partial skull including an upper jaw with teeth which is about 2.5 million years old.

Stw 573, "Little Foot", Australopithecus
Discovered by Ron Clarke between 1994 and 1997 at Sterkfontein in South Africa. Estimated age is 3.3 million years. This fossil consists, so far, of many bones from the foot, leg, hand and arm, and a complete skull. More bones are thought to be still embedded in rock. (Clarke and Tobias 1995, Clarke 1998, Clarke 1999)

(An increasing number of scientists are placing the following three species, aethiopicus, robustus and boisei, in the genus Paranthropus)

KNM-WT 17000 , "The Black Skull", Australopithecus aethiopicus
Discovered by Alan Walker in 1985 near West Turkana in Kenya. Estimated age is 2.5 million years. This find is an intact, almost complete cranium. The brain size is very small for a hominid, about 410 cc, and the skull has a puzzling mixture of primitive and advanced features. (Leakey and Lewin 1992)

TM 1517 , Australopithecus robustus (was Paranthropus robustus)
Discovered by a schoolboy, Gert Terblanche, in 1938 at Kromdraai in South Africa (Broom 1938). It consisted of skull fragments, including five teeth, and a few skeletal fragments. This was the first specimen of robustus.

SK 48, Australopithecus robustus (was Paranthropus crassidens)
Discovered by Mr. Fourie in 1950 at Swartkrans in South Africa (Johanson and Edgar 1996). It is a cranium, probably belonging to an adult female, and 1.5-2.0 million years old. It is the most complete skull of robustus.

DNH 7, "Eurydice", Australopithecus robustus
Discovered by André Keyser in 1994 at the Drimolen cave in South Africa. Estimated age is between 1.5 and 2.0 million years. This is an almost complete skull and lower jaw of a female, one of the most complete hominid skulls ever found, and the first significant fossil of a female robustus. A fossil of a male robustus lower jaw, nicknamed Orpheus (DNH 8), was found a few inches away from it. (Keyser 2000)

OH 5, "Zinjanthropus", "Nutcracker Man", Australopithecus boisei
Discovered by Mary Leakey in 1959 at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania (Leakey 1959). Estimated age is 1.8 million years. It is an almost complete cranium, with a brain size is about 530 cc. This was the first specimen of this species. Louis Leakey briefly considered this a human ancestor, but the claim was dropped when Homo habilis was found soon afterwards.

KNM-ER 406, Australopithecus boisei
Discovered by Richard Leakey in 1969 near Lake Turkana in Kenya. This find was a complete, intact cranium lacking only the teeth (Lewin 1987). Estimated age is about 1.7 million years. The brain size is about 510 cc. (see also ER 3733)

KNM-ER 732, Australopithecus boisei
Discovered by Richard Leakey in 1970 near Lake Turkana in Kenya. The cranium is similar to that of OH 5, but is smaller and has other differences such as the lack of a sagittal crest. The estimated age is about 1.7 million years. The brain size is about 500 cc. Most experts believe this is a case of sexual dimorphism, with the female being smaller than the male.

KGA10-525 , Australopithecus boisei
Discovered by A. Amzaye in 1993 at Konso in Ethiopia (Suwa et al. 1997). This fossil consists of much of a skull, including a lower jaw. The estimated age is 1.4 million years. The brain size is estimated to be about 545 cc. Although it has many features specific to boisei, it also lies outside the previously known range of variation of that species in many ways, suggesting that boisei (and maybe other hominid species) may have been more variable than is often thought (Delson 1997).

Homo habilis
Discovered by the Leakeys in the early 1960's at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. A number of fragmentary specimens were found (Leakey et al. 1964).

OH 7 , "Jonny's Child", found by Jonathon Leakey in 1960 (Leakey 1961), consisted of a lower jaw and two cranial fragments of a child, and a few hand bones. Estimated age is 1.8 million years, and the brain size was about 680 cc.
OH 8: found in 1960, consisted of a set of foot bones, complete except for the back of the heel and the toes. Estimated age is about 1.8 million years. They have a mixture of human and ape traits, but are consistent with bipedal locomotion. (Aiello and Dean 1990)
OH 13 , "Cindy": found in 1963, consisted of a lower jaw and teeth, bits of the upper jaw and a cranial fragment. Estimated age is 1.6 million years, and the brain size was about 650 cc.
OH 16, "George": found in 1963, consisted of teeth and some very fragmentary parts of the skull. (George was unfortunately trampled by Masai cattle before he was found, and much of the skull was lost.) Estimated age is 1.7 million years, and the brain size was about 640 cc.

OH 24, "Twiggy", Homo habilis
Discovered by Peter Nzube in 1968 at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. It consisted of an fairly complete but very badly crushed cranium and seven teeth. It is about 1.85 million years old and has a brain size of about 590 cc.

KNM-ER 1470, Homo habilis (or Homo rudolfensis?)
Discovered by Bernard Ngeneo in 1972 at Koobi Fora in Kenya (Leakey 1973). Estimated age is 1.9 million years. This is the most complete habilis skull known. Its brain size is 750 cc, large for habilis. It was originally dated at nearly 3 million years old, a figure that caused much confusion as at the time it was older than any known australopithecines, from whom habilis had supposedly descended. A lively debate over the dating of 1470 ensued (Lewin 1987; Johanson and Edey 1981; Lubenow 1992). The skull is surprisingly modern in some respects. The braincase is much larger and less robust than any australopithecine skull, and is also without the large brow ridges typical of Homo erectus. It is however very large and robust in the face. A number of leg bones were found within a couple of kilometers, and are thought to probably belong to the same species. The most complete, KNM-ER 1481, consisted of a complete left femur, both ends of a left tibia and the lower end of a left fibula (the smaller of the two lower leg bones). These are quite similar to the bones of modern humans. (Creationist arguments)

KNM-ER 1805 , "The Mystery Skull", Homo habilis??
Discovered by Paul Abell in 1973 at Koobi Fora in Kenya (Leakey 1974). Estimated age is 1.85 million years. This find consisted of much of a heavily built cranium containing many teeth. Its brain size is about 600 cc. Some features, such as the sagittal crest, are typical of A. boisei, but the teeth are too small for that species. (Willis 1989; Day 1986) Various workers have assigned it to almost every conceivable species, but many studies have attributed it to Homo habilis (e.g. Wood 1991). A recent cladistic study has placed it outside of Homo and most similar to robust australopithecines, though different from any named species. (Prat 2002)

KNM-ER 1813, Homo habilis?
Discovered by Kamoya Kimeu in 1973 at Koobi Fora in Kenya (Leakey 1974). This specimen is similar to 1470, but is much smaller, with a brain size of 510 cc. Estimated age is 1.8-1.9 million years. Some scientists believe this a case of sexual dimorphism, others believe that the brain architecture is different and that 1813 is another species of Homo, and others believe it is an australopithecine. Like the previous skull, 1805, this one is in the "Suspense Account". (Willis 1989)

Stw 53, Homo habilis?
Discovered by Alun Hughes in 1976 at Sterkfontein in South Africa (Hughes and Tobias 1977). Estimated age is 1.5 to 2 million years. It consisted of a number of cranium fragments including teeth. Many stone tools were found in the same layer.

OH 62 , "Dik-dik hominid", Homo habilis
Discovered by Tim White in 1986 at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania (Johanson and Shreeve 1989; Johanson et al. 1987). Estimated age is 1.8 million years. The find consisted of portions of skull, arm, leg bones and teeth. Almost all the features of the skull closely resemble habilis fossils such as OH 24, ER 1813 and ER 1470, rather than the australopithecines. But the estimated height is very small, maybe about 105 cm (3'5"), and the arms are very long in proportion to the legs. These are australopithecine traits, and in fact the skeletal bones are very similar to those of Lucy. This find is significant because it is the only fossil in which limb bones have been securely assigned to habilis. Because of the small size, this was almost certainly a female. As with the australopithecines, males would have been considerably larger.

OH 65, Homo habilis
Discovered in 1995 at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. This fossil consisted of a complete upper jaw and part of the lower face, dated at 1.8 million years. Because of its similarities to the fossil ER 1470, its finders have suggested that OH 65 may lead to a reclassification of the habiline fossils. (Blumenschine et al. 2003, Tobias 2003)

Trinil 2, "Java Man", "Pithecanthropus I", Homo erectus (was Pithecanthropus erectus)
Discovered by Eugene Dubois in 1891 near Trinil on the Indonesian island of Java. Its age is uncertain, but thought to be about 700,000 years. This find consisted of a flat, very thick skullcap, and a few teeth (which may belong to orang-utans). The following year a femur was found about 12 meters away (Theunissen 1989). The brain size is about 940 cc. The femur is fully modern, and many scientists now believe that it belongs to a modern human. (Creationist arguments)

"Peking Man Site", Homo erectus (was Sinanthropus pekinensis)
Between 1929 and 1937, 14 partial craniums, 11 lower jaws, many teeth, some skeletal bones and large numbers of stone tools were discovered in the Lower Cave at Locality 1 of the Peking Man site at Zhoukoudian (formerly Choukoutien), near Beijing (formerly Peking), in China. Their age is estimated to be between 500,000 and 300,000 years old. (A number of fossils of modern humans were also discovered in the Upper Cave at the same site in 1933.) The most complete fossils, all of which were braincases or skullcaps, are:

Skull III, discovered at Locus E in 1929 is an adolescent or juvenile with a brain size of 915 cc.
Skull II, discovered at Locus D in 1929 but only recognized in 1930, is an adult or adolescent with a brain size of 1030 cc.
Skulls X, XI and XII (sometimes called LI, LII and LIII) were discovered at Locus L in 1936. They are thought to belong to an adult man, an adult woman and a young adult, with brain sizes of 1225 cc, 1015 cc and 1030 cc respectively. (Weidenreich 1937)
Skull V: two cranial fragments were discovered in 1966 which fit with (casts of) two other fragments found in 1934 and 1936 to form much of a skullcap with a brain size of 1140 cc. These pieces were found at a higher level, and appear to be more modern than the other skullcaps. (Jia and Huang 1990) (Creationist arguments)

Most of the study on these fossils was done by Davidson Black until his death in 1934. Franz Weidenreich replaced him and studied the fossils until leaving China in 1941. The original fossils disappeared in 1941 while being shipped to the United States for safety during World War II, but excellent casts and descriptions remain. Since the war, other erectus fossils have been found at this site and others in China.

Sangiran 2, "Pithecanthropus II", Homo erectus
Discovered by G.H.R. von Koenigswald in 1937 at Sangiran on the Indonesian island of Java. This fossil is a braincase that is very similar to the first Java Man skull cap, but more complete and smaller, with a brain size of only about 815 cc.

OH 9, "Chellean Man", Homo erectus
Discovered by Louis Leakey in 1960 at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania (Leakey 1961). Estimated age is 1.5 million years. It consisted of a partial braincase with massive browridges and a brain size of 1065 cc.

OH 12 , "Pinhead", Homo erectus
Discovered by Margaret Cropper in 1962 at Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. It is similar to but less complete than OH 9, and smaller, with an estimated brain size of only 750 cc. It is estimated to be between 800,000 and 1200,000 years old. Anton (2004) has found a few more pieces of this skull, but it remains very fragmentary.

Sangiran 17, "Pithecanthropus VIII", Homo erectus
Discovered by Sastrohamidjojo Sartono in 1969 at Sangiran on Java. This consists of a fairly complete cranium, with a brain size of about 1000 cc. It is the most complete erectus fossil from Java. This skull is very robust, with a slightly projecting face and huge flaring cheekbones. It has been thought to be about 800,000 years old, but a recent dating has given a much older figure of nearly 1.7 million years. If the older date is correct, it means Homo erectus migrated out of Africa much earlier than previously thought.

KNM-ER 3733, Homo erectus (or Homo ergaster)
Discovered by Bernard Ngeneo in 1975 at Koobi Fora in Kenya. Estimated age is 1.7 million years. This superb find consisted of an almost complete cranium. The brain size is about 850 cc, and the whole skull is similar to the Peking Man fossils. The discovery of this fossil in the same stratum as ER 406 (A. boisei) delivered the coup de grace to the single species hypothesis: the idea that there has never been more than one hominid species at any point in history. (Leakey and Walker 1976)

KNM-WT 15000, "Turkana Boy", Homo erectus (or Homo ergaster)
Discovered by Kamoya Kimeu in 1984 at Nariokotome near Lake Turkana in Kenya (Brown et al. 1985; Leakey and Lewin 1992; Walker and Leakey 1993; Walker and Shipman 1996). This is an almost complete skeleton of an 11 or 12 year old boy, the only major omissions being the hands and feet. (Some scientists believe erectus matured faster than modern humans, and that he was really about 9 years old (Leakey and Lewin 1992).) It is the most complete known specimen of erectus, and also one of the oldest, at 1.6 million years. The brain size was 880 cc, and it is estimated that it would have been 910 cc at adulthood. The boy was 160 cm (5'3") tall, and would have been about 185 cm (6'1") as an adult. This is surprisingly tall, indicating that many erectus may have been as large as modern humans. Except for the skull, the skeleton is very similar to that of modern boys, although there are a number of small differences. The most striking is that the holes in his vertebrae, through which the spinal cord goes, have only about half the cross-sectional area found in modern humans. One suggested explanation for this is that the boy lacked the fine motor control we have in the thorax to control speech, implying that he wasn't nearly as fluent a speaker as modern humans are (Walker and Shipman 1996).

D2700, Homo georgicus
Discovered in 2001 at Dmanisi in Georgia. Estimated age is 1.8 million years. It consisted of a mostly complete skull, including a lower jaw (D2735) belonging to the same individual. (Vekua et al. 2002, Balter and Gibbons 2002) At around 600 cc, this is the smallest and most primitive hominid skull ever discovered outside of Africa. This skull and two others discovered nearby form a near-perfect transition between H. habilis and ergaster.

ATD6-69, Homo antecessor?
Discovered at Atapuerca in Spain. This is a partial face of a child who was probably about 10 to 11.5 years old. This fossil is over 780,000 years old. (Bermudez de Castro et al. 1997)

"Heidelberg Man", "Mauer Jaw", Homo sapiens (archaic) (also Homo heidelbergensis)
Discovered by gravel pit workers in 1907 near Heidelberg in Germany. Estimated age is between 400,000 and 700,000 years. This find consisted of a lower jaw with a receding chin and all its teeth. The jaw is extremely large and robust, like that of Homo erectus, but the teeth are at the small end of the erectus range. It is often classified as Homo heidelbergensis, but has also sometimes been considered to be a European Homo erectus.

"Rhodesian Man", "Kabwe", Homo sapiens (archaic) (was Homo rhodesiensis)
Discovered by a laborer in 1921 at Broken Hill in Northern Rhodesia (now Kabwe in Zambia) (Woodward 1921). This was a complete cranium that was very robust, with large brow ridges and a receding forehead. Estimated age is between 200,000 and 125,000 years. The brain size was about 1280 cc. (Creationist arguments)

Arago XXI, "Tautavel Man", Homo sapiens (archaic) (also Homo heidelbergensis)
Discovered at Arago in southern France in 1971 by Henry de Lumley. Estimated age is 400,000 years. The fossil consists of a fairly complete face, with 5 molar teeth and part of the braincase. The brain size was about 1150 cc. The skull contains a mixture of features from archaic Homo sapiens and Homo erectus, to which it is sometimes assigned.

Petralona 1, Homo sapiens (archaic)
Discovered by villagers at Petralona in Greece in 1960. Estimated age is 250,000-500,000 years. It could alternatively be considered to be a late Homo erectus, and also has some Neandertal characteristics. The brain size is 1220 cc, high for erectus but low for sapiens, and the face is large with particularly wide jaws. (Day 1986)

Atapuerca 5, Homo sapiens (archaic)
Discovered in the Sima de los Huesos ("Pit of Bones") at the Atapuerca cave site in northern Spain in 1992 and 1993 by Juan-Luis Arsuaga. It is about 300,000 years old, with a brain size of 1125 cc. The face is broad with a huge nasal opening, and resembles Neandertals in some traits but not in others. This is the most complete pre-modern skull in the entire hominid fossil record. (Arsuaga et al. 1993; Johanson and Edgar 1996)

Feldhofer, Neanderthal 1, Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
Discovered by Johann Fuhlrott in 1856 in a small cave at Feldhofer in the Neander Valley in Germany. The find consisted of a skullcap, thigh bones, part of a pelvis, some ribs, and some arm and shoulder bones. The lower left arm had been broken in life, and as a result the bones of the left arm were smaller than those of the right. Fuhlrott recognized it as a primitive human, but the German establishment headed by Rudolf Virchow rejected this view, incorrectly claiming that it was a pathological modern human. (Trinkaus and Shipman 1992) In 1999, the original site was rediscovered, and more bones from the same specimen were recovered. (Creationist arguments)

(There were actually two earlier Neandertal finds. A partial cranium of a 2.5 year old child found in 1829 in Belgium was not recognized until 1936. An adult cranium found on Gibraltar in 1848 gathered dust in a museum until it was recognized as a Neandertal in 1864.)

"Spy 1 and 2", Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
Discovered by Marcel de Puydt and Max Lohest in 1886 at the Grotto of Spy (pronounced Spee) d'Orneau in Belgium. Estimated age is about 60,000 years. This find consisted of two almost complete skeletons. The excellent descriptions of the skeletons established that they were very old, and largely discredited the idea that the Neandertal physique was a pathological condition, but also erroneously concluded that Neandertal Man walked with bent knees.

"Krapina Site" , Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
Discovered by Dragutin Gorjanovic-Kramberger in 1899 near Krapina in Croatia. This site yielded significant remains from two to three dozen individuals, and teeth and jaw fragments from dozens more. When Gorjanovic published on his finds in 1906, it confirmed for once and for all that Neandertals were not pathological modern humans.

"Old Man", Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
Discovered by Amedee and Jean Bouyssonie in 1908 near La-Chapelle-aux-Saints in France. It is about 50,000 years old, with a brain size of 1620 cc. This nearly complete skeleton was reconstructed by Marcellin Boule, who wrote a definitive and highly influential paper on it which managed to be totally wrong in many of its conclusions. It exaggerated the apelike characteristics of the fossil, popularizing the stereotype, which would last for decades, of a stooping ape-man shuffling along on bent knees. This specimen was between about 30 and 40 when he died, but had a healed broken rib, severe arthritis of the hip, lower neck, back and shoulders, and had lost most of his molar teeth. The fact that he survived as long as he did indicates that Neandertals must have had a complex social structure.

"Shanidar Site" , Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
Ralph Solecki discovered 9 Neandertal skeletons between 1953 and 1960 at the Shanidar cave in Iraq. They are thought to be between 70,000 and 40,000 years old. One of them, Shanidar 4, had apparently been buried with offerings of flowers (although this interpretation has been disputed). In 1971 Solecki wrote a book, "Shanidar, the First Flower People " , reversing the earlier stereotypes of semi-human brutes. Another skeleton, Shanidar 1, was partially blind, one-armed and crippled. His survival also is evidence of a complex social structure.

"Saint-Cesaire Neandertal", Homo sapiens neanderthalensis
Discovered by Francois Leveque in 1979 near the village of Saint-Cesaire in France. It consisted of a badly crushed skeleton. The skull was mostly complete, with only the back of the cranium missing. It is dated at about 35,000 years old, and is one of the latest Neandertals known. This find was of special interest because it was found with tools that had previously been assumed to belong to the Cro-Magnon culture, instead of the usual Neandertal tool kit.

LB1, "Hobbit", Homo floresiensis
Discovered by an Australian/Indonesian team in 2003 at the Liang Bua cave on the Indonesian island of Flores. This find consisted of an almost complete skull and a partial skeleton consisting of leg bones, parts of the pelvis, hands and feet, and some other fragments. LB1 was an adult, probably female, about 1 meter (3'3") tall with an extremely small brain size of 417cc. The skull has human-like teeth with a receding forehead and no chin. The fossil is 18,000 years old and was found with stone tools. This species is thought to be a dwarf form of Homo erectus. (Brown et al. 2004, Morwood et al. 2004, Lahr and Foley 2004)

"Cro-Magnon Site", Homo sapiens sapiens (modern)
Discovered by workmen in 1868 at Cro-Magnon in France. Estimated age is 30,000 years. The site yielded skeletons of 5 buried individuals, along with stone tools, carved reindeer antlers, ivory pendants, and shells. The Cro-Magnons lived in Europe between 35,000 and 10,000 years ago. They are virtually identical to modern man, being tall and muscular and slightly more robust than most modern humans. They were skilled hunters, toolmakers and artists famous for the cave art at places such as Lascaux, Chauvet, and Altamira.

Summary

There are a number of clear trends (which were neither continuous nor uniform) from early australopithecines to recent humans: increasing brain size, increasing body size, increasing use of and sophistication in tools, decreasing tooth size, decreasing skeletal robustness. There are no clear dividing lines between some of the later gracile australopithecines and some of the early Homo, between erectus and archaic sapiens, or archaic sapiens and modern sapiens.

Creationist Wayne Jackson quotes the paragraph to the left in an online article. Read my response here.

Despite this, there is little consensus on what our family tree is. Everyone accepts that the robust australopithecines (aethiopicus, robustus and boisei) are not ancestral to us, being a side branch that left no descendants. Whether H. habilis is descended from A. afarensis, africanus, both of them, or neither of them, is still a matter of debate. It is possible that none of the known australopithecines is our ancestor.

A number of new genera and species have been discovered within the last decade (Ar. ramidus, Au. amanensis, Au. bahrelghazali, Au. garhi, Orrorin, Kenyanthropus, Sahelanthropus) and no consensus has yet formed on how they are related to each other or to humans. It is generally accepted that Homo erectus is descended from Homo habilis (or, at least, some of the fossils often assigned to habilis), but the relationship between erectus, sapiens and the Neandertals is still unclear. Neandertal affinities can be detected in some specimens of both archaic and modern sapiens.

This page is part of the Fossil Hominids FAQ at the talk.origins Archive.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/homs/specimen.html, 10/31/2004
Copyright © Jim Foley || Email me